Historical Shifts: The Ever-Moving Target
Bodies for Sale: How the Fashion Industry Manufactures the “Ideal” Form
“Fashion doesn’t shape trends—it shapes bodies. And we keep paying the price.”
In glossy magazines and digital feeds, the “perfect” body is not just admired—it’s constructed. Modified. Filtered. Marketed. The fashion industry has always dictated body standards, but in the age of TikTok, AI, and biohacking, those standards have become dangerously fluid and insidiously unrealistic.
The body has become a fashion product—something to style, sell, and sculpt. But who decides what’s desirable? And who profits from this desire?
Body ideals have never been fixed—they evolve with politics, capitalism, and power.
• In the Renaissance, full-figured bodies symbolized wealth and fertility.
• In the 1920s, the “flapper” aesthetic demanded boyish thinness and small breasts.
• The 1990s brought the “heroin chic” look: pale, gaunt, and hollow-eyed.
• The 2010s, shaped by Kim Kardashian and Instagram influencers, normalized exaggerated curves—yet ironically, these curves often required surgery, waist trainers, or Photoshop to achieve.
Fashion doesn’t just reflect these ideals—it manufactures and monetizes them.
A 2022 study by the University of Melbourne found that 78% of female fashion models were underweight by WHO standards. And yet, these bodies are considered “aspirational.”
Historical Shifts: The Ever-Moving Target
Shapewear.
• Skincare.
• Fat-freezing.
• Weight-loss teas.
• Surgical filters.
• AI “face-tuning” apps.
Each year, the beauty and fashion-adjacent industries generate over $500 billion, much of it by creating and then offering to “solve” the flaws they invented.
And yes, fashion is complicit.
Runways still favor tall, thin, Eurocentric bodies.
Luxury brands rarely use disabled or visibly aging models.
Campaigns that claim to be “inclusive” often tokenize difference rather than normalize it.
As writer Jia Tolentino noted in The New Yorker, “The new body positivity often just repackages old hierarchies with better lighting.”
The Economics of Insecurity.
The Economics of Insecurity.
The fashion industry runs on manufactured insecurity. You cannot sell self-love. But you can sell solutions.
sell self-love. But you can sell solutions.
Digital Distortion: Fashion in the Age of Filters
We no longer look at fashion—we consume it through layers of unreality.
Instagram and TikTok have introduced the era of hyper-visual culture, where bodies are infinitely editable. Filters elongate limbs. AI avatars wear couture. Apps like Facetune blur cellulite and enlarge eyes in seconds.
This distorts how we perceive ourselves and others.
The Royal Society for Public Health (UK) reported that 91% of teenage girls feel unhappy with their bodies after using social media for more than an hour.
And now, digital fashion models like Shudu Gram or Imma—CGI women created by male designers—are being hired by brands, often paid more than real models.
Digital Distortion: Fashion in the Age of Filters